This is the title of an article in First Things by theologian Peter Leithart. I marvel how spiritually astute theologians can express their thoughts in such a concise and profound manner. I found this to be true of Leithart’s discussion of sexuality. I hope I can do justice to his very insightful article in this short blog. He begins with this insightful statement, “Ours is an age of sexual insanity.” After giving a litany of examples, he notes, “Our sexual ethic reduces to a single prohibition: Thou shalt not suppress any sexual desires.”
“How can we free ourselves from the morass,” wonders Leithart. He points us to the Song of Songs (S of S 4:16-5:1). “At the center of the Song of Songs is a garden scene: Bridegroom and Bride rejoice in one another in an erotic Eden, which rekindles the sexual bliss of a new Adam and a new Eve, fired by the unquenchable flame of Yahweh’s love.”
He asks, “What is restored?” It is found in the dance of mutual desire between male and female. “The Bride initiates the duet, longing for the Bridegroom’s inebriating kisses, intoxicated by his fragrance, hoping to escape to a chamber where they can drink together the wine of love….. .their desires are fulfilled in an erotic banquet where each is both host(ess) and fare.” Sexual purity is restored as it burns white-hot. Leithart notes, “Each receives, each gives; each is consuming, each is consumed. For Solomon, something like erotic delirium, charged by the current of mutual passion, is the pinnacle of sexual rationality.” Leithart suggests, “far from dividing or separating, sexual disjunction ‘links.'”
Solitude isn’t good for either men or women. “In the erotic Eden of the Song, woman becomes herself by virtue of her magnetic attraction to the man, while the man is man as he bends in desire toward his bride.” We are not able the understand the reality of “woman’ without co-implicating the reality “man.” When man and woman are restored to their polarity and harmony, the Song’s erotic Eden portrays a humanity no longer disabled.
Bu the Song isn’t just a love story. The bridegroom is the lover, Yahweh. The bride is not a generic beloved, but the Bride of Christ. The erotic Eden of the Song is also a liturgical Eden, where the Creator communes with man in the original marriage whose icon is the disjunctive union of male and female.” If we read the Song as both a poem and allegory it helps us with sanity. We need to see the liturgical Eden as well as the erotic Eden.
Leithart closes with this observation. “But we can’t reach past the liturgical Eden to seize the erotic Eden. The liturgical enacts the archetypal reciprocity and bi-polarity of Bridegroom and Bride. The path to sexual sanity passes through the liturgical dialogue of Christ Jesus and his church, which alone restores our broken sexuality and models the polyphonic love for which God created us in his image as male and female.”
I embrace the images of erotic and liturgical Eden. Most evangelical have not focused on the liturgical Eden, whereas the past history of Christian spirituality has given us many commentaries on the Song, seeing the church as the bride and Jesus as the bridegroom. This has been my view for nearly thirty years. It has helped me to experience my sexual energy intermingled with my spiritual energy. My sexual passions are as holy as those of my spiritual passions. I can admit that I am a soulful man with erotic desires. May my deepest passion be for the Lord, while not being ashamed of my sexual energy.
Recent Comments