As expected there has been a great deal of discussion regarding the results of the election. Personally the results have confirmed views I have expressed on masculinity. Of special interest to me are the voting trends of young men and male minorities. While I have remained steadfast in my neutrality, due to the deep political divide in our culture, and my commitment to Jesus and his Kingdom as the ultimate answer, I find the “gender gap” phenomenon of great interest. There is much that is insightful for the “wild man” journey.
I must confess, bringing clarity to the discussion is not my strength. However, there is so much which is obvious that I feel I can share. Much of what I have absorbed, as a elderly, white, Christian male has been reinforced by my wonderful wife of 59 years. I consider our deep discussion on gender roles a valuable point of reference for younger men, trying to make sense of “the gender wars” of our day. So this could lead into a series of blogs.
First, Aaron Renn’s observations. He observes, “As had been said by others, there’s a difference between being a good man and being good at being a man. Masculine virtues and expectations are not exactly amoral, but can often be expressed in both good and bad ways.” Using the attempted assassination of Trump and his now iconic shout of “fight, fight,” Renn believes “Trump’s courage under actual fire helps to explain his appeal to men, especially young men.” For me personally, while acknowledging Mr. Trump’s moral flaws and lack of Christian character, I raise up in admiration when He want to fight for “the little, forgotten guy” and the neglected American.
Renn, using anthropologist David Gilmore’s work, notes, “Trump, for all his flaws, models many traditional masculine attributes that young men would do well to adopt.” The former president is “high energy” and competitive, challenging young men who are getting launched. He is “in the arena” willing to take substantial public risks. He is capable of what Gilmore calls “absolute freedom of movement,” that is, he will press on despite overwhelming opposition. And as Renn notes, “He even went back to hold another rally at the place where he was shot.” Older and younger men, who are followers of Jesus need to be “engaged,” “in the arena” and willing to “press on” no matter what the cost. As a man I admire Trump for this tough-nosed qualities.
Here is some sound advise from Renn. “Young men must wed Trump’s masculine attributes to greater moral integrity and a mature style…. assertive manhood is not inherently toxic. Even conservatives have too often equated being a good man with being a dutiful doormat. Healthy masculinity is agentic, aggressive, competitive, courageous, and generous, productive, moral and dignified. Men need not consider these values to be in conflict.”
As a senior, who has lived through the cultural wars of the 60’s down through the present age, I know from personal experience of Gilmore’s conclusion that “cultures generally define manhood as an earned status.” My favorite way of expressing masculinity in our day, is for men to see themselves as both “the lion” and “the lamb” (that is, tough and tender). Jesus was the perfect lamb sacrificed for our sin, yet he is “the Lion of the tribe of Judah” (Rev. 5:5). The Revelation declares the Lamb as overcoming. “They will make war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will overcome them because he is Lord of Lords and King of King” (Rev. 17:14). We are his followers are learning to tough and tender.
Recent Comments